4.3 Article

Effect of calcium and magnesium on neurotoxicity and blood platinum concentrations in patients receiving mFOLFOX6 therapy: a prospective randomized study

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-009-0015-3

关键词

Calcium gluconate; Magnesium sulfate; Neurotoxicity; Oxaliplatin; Platinum

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whether the administration of calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) can reduce oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity remains controversial. In addition, little is known about the effects of Ca/Mg on the blood level of platinum or objective tumor progression. Patients receiving modified FOLFOX6 for metastatic colorectal cancer were double-blinded and randomized to receive additional treatment with Ca/Mg or placebo before and after the administration of oxaliplatin. The plasma and ultrafiltrable concentrations of platinum during the first and fifth cycles of treatment were determined using inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Patients were randomized to receive Ca/Mg (Ca/Mg group, n = 17) or placebo (placebo group, n = 16) before and after the administration of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)). The incidence of neurotoxicity after six cycles was not significantly different between the two groups. Blood concentrations of platinum at each time and the area under the curve were also not significantly different between the two groups. Furthermore, the response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) did not differ significantly between the two groups (Ca/Mg group: RR 36%, DCR 73%. Placebo group: RR 40%, DCR 70%, P > 0.99). The median progression-free survival time was 9.2 months in the Ca/Mg group and 8.1 months in the control group; these survival times were not significantly different (P = 0.56). These data are insufficient to conclude with any certainty that the administration of Ca/Mg is not neuroprotective; however, the administration of Ca/Mg may not have any influence on antitumor activity and the blood concentration profile of platinum in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据