4.6 Article

Estimating uncertainty in daily weather interpolations: a Bayesian framework for developing climate surfaces

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 2573-2584

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/joc.3859

关键词

interpolation; Bayesian; krige; climate metric; ecology

资金

  1. NSF [OISE-0623341, DEB-0516320, DEB-1046328]
  2. NASA under NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program grant [NNX09AN82H]
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1046328] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. NASA [113766, NNX09AN82H] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conservation of biodiversity demands comprehension of evolutionary and ecological patterns and processes that occur over vast spatial and temporal scales. A central goal of ecology is to understand the climatic factors that control ecological processes and this has become even more important in the face of climate change. Especially at global scales, there can be enormous uncertainty in underlying environmental data used to explain ecological processes, but that uncertainty is rarely quantified or incorporated into ecological models. In this study, a climate-aided Bayesian kriging approach is used to interpolate 20years of daily meteorological observations (maximum and minimum temperatures and precipitation) to a 1 arc-min grid for the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa. Independent validation data revealed overall predictive performance of the interpolation to have R2 values of 0.90, 0.85, and 0.59 for maximum temperature, minimum temperature, and precipitation, respectively. A suite of ecologically relevant climate metrics that include the uncertainty introduced by the interpolation were then generated. By providing the high-resolution climate metric surfaces and uncertainties, this work facilitates richer and more robust predictive modelling in ecology and biogeography. These data can be incorporated into ecological models to propagate the uncertainties through to the final predictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据