4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Air-Sea fluxes from ICOADS: the construction of a new gridded dataset with uncertainty estimates

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
卷 31, 期 7, 页码 987-1001

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/joc.2059

关键词

ICOADS; flux; ocean; air-sea interaction; VOS; ship; marine meteorology

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010002, noc010012] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NERC [noc010002] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The methods used to calculate a new in situ global dataset of air-sea exchanges, called the NOCS Flux Dataset v2.0, are described. The fluxes have been derived from in situ weather reports from Voluntary Observing Ships (VOS) covering the period 1973-2006. The reports have been adjusted for known biases and residual uncertainties estimated. The dataset is constructed using Optimal Interpolation (OI) using new estimates of random uncertainty in the observations. Daily fields have been calculated on a 1 degrees latitude by 1 degrees longitude grid, each grid box and time step have an associated uncertainty estimate. Monthly fields have been calculated from simple averages of the daily fields and monthly uncertainty estimates from the daily uncertainties, using estimates of the autocorrelation between the daily uncertainty estimates. The uncertainties due to the choice of flux parameterisation have not been accounted for. Bias adjustments applied to the data are shown to reduce trends in the data and to improve the consistency of estimates of air temperature, sea surface temperature (SST) and specific humidity. The bias adjustments also improve the agreement of NOCS v2.0 with independent data from research moorings. Cross-validation of the dataset suggests that the uncertainty estimates are realistic, but that the uncertainties are probably underestimated in high variability regions and overestimated in regions with lower variability. Copyright (C) 2009 Royal Meteorological Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据