4.6 Article

Annual and seasonal surface air temperature trends in Mexico

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 1324-1329

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/joc.1787

关键词

Mexico climate; surface air temperature; trends

资金

  1. Mexican CONACYT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maximum and minimum surface air temperatures (T-max, T-min) throughout Mexico were analysed to look for a regional sign of climate change. Temperature (T) records were divided into two periods: early (1940-1969) and recent (1970-2004): and the analysis was performed for the four seasons plus the annual average. For these 20 cases, and for each of similar to 1400 selected stations, time series were Constructed and their linear trends (m) were obtained. The statistical significance of m was tested by posing the null hypothesis m = 0, i.e. that there was no trend. The length of the time series (n) considered for this test was the n-effective (n(eff)) that takes into account the fact that consecutive values of T have non-zero correlation. The null hypothesis was rejected in less than 25% of the stations in all cases. The principal findings are: (1) Mexico warmed up during the recent period, and this warming was more generalized in T-max than in T-min and in summer than in the other seasons: (2) Mexico cooled down during the early period, and this cooling was more generalized in winter than in the other seasons (3) In neither of these two cases El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) seems to play any direct role, (4) In contrast to ENSO, the trends and phases of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) are consequent in both cases: a warming trend at the beginning of the 1970s and a warm PDO phase prevailing during the recent warming period; as well as a cooling trend at the beginning, of the 1940s and a cold PDO phase prevailing during the early cooling period and (5) north-western and central Mexico temperature trends often contrast with those of the rest of the country. Copyright (C) 2008 Royal Meteorological Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据