4.1 Article

Chemical-Kinetic Modeling of Ignition Delay: Considerations in Interpreting Shock Tube Data

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL KINETICS
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 143-150

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/kin.20471

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-07-1-0515]
  2. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-86ER13503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-pressure shock tube ignition delays have been and continue to be one of the key sources of data that are important to characterizing the combustion properties of real fuels At. pressures and temperatures of importance to practical applications, concerns have recently been raised as to the large differences observed between experimental data and chemical-kinetic predictions using the common assumption that the shock tube behaves as a constant Volume (V) system with constant internal energy (U) Here, a concise review is presented of phenomena that can considerably affect shock tube data at the extended test times (several milliseconds or longer) needed for the measurement of fuel/air ignition at practical conditions (i.e, high pressures and relatively low temperatures) These effects Include fluid dynamic nonidealities as well as deflagrative processes typical of mild ignition events Proposed modeling approaches that attempt to Lake into account these effects, by employing isentropic assumptions and pressure- and temperature-varying systems, are evaluated and shown to significantly improve modeling results Finally, it is argued that at the conditions of interest ignition delay data do not represent pure chemical-kinetic observations but are affected by phenomena that are in some measure facility specific This hampers direct cross comparison of the experimental ignition data collected in different venues In Such cases, pressure/temperature histories should be provided in order to properly interpret: shock tube ignition data (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals. Inc Int J Chem Kinet 42 143-150, 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据