4.3 Article

Impact of right ventricular endocardial trabeculae on volumes and function assessed by CMR in patients with tetralogy of Fallot

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0112-7

关键词

Tetralogy of Fallot; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; Right ventricle; Trabeculae; Segmentation software

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of right ventricular (RV) trabeculae and papillary muscles on measured volumes and function assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Sixty-five patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot underwent routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Endocardial and epicardial contours were drawn manually and included trabeculae and papillary muscles in the blood volume. Semi-automatic threshold-based segmentation software excluded these structures. Both methods were compared in terms of end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volume, ejection fraction and mass. Observer agreement was determined for all measures. Exclusion of trabeculae and papillary muscle in the RV blood volume decreased measured RV end-diastolic volume by 15 % (from 140 +/- A 35 to 120 +/- A 32 ml/m(2)) compared to inclusion, end-systolic volume by 21 % (from 74 +/- A 23 to 59 +/- A 20 ml/m(2)), stroke volume by 9 % (from 66 +/- A 16 to 60 +/- A 16 ml/m(2)) and relatively increased ejection fraction by 7 % (from 48 +/- A 7 to 51 +/- A 8 %) and end-diastolic mass by 79 % (from 28 +/- A 7 to 51 +/- A 10 g/m(2)), p < .01. Excluding trabeculae and papillary muscle resulted in an improved interobserver agreement of RV mass compared to including these structures (coefficient of agreement of 87 versus 78 %, p < .01). Trabeculae and papillary muscle significantly affect measured RV volumes, function and mass. Semi-automatic threshold-based segmentation software can reliably exclude trabeculae and papillary muscles from the RV blood volume.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据