4.3 Article

Endocardial and epicardial myocardial perfusion determined by semi-quantitative and quantitative myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9982-3

关键词

Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial perfusion; Myocardial blood flow; Hyperaemia; Fermi deconvolution; Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to quantify subendocardial and subepicardial myocardial blood flow (MBF) from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and to compare semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis methods. 17 healthy volunteers (9 males, mean age 34 +/- A 8) were scanned during adenosine stress and at rest. A semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion index (MPI) was calculated based on maximal upslopes of signal intensity-time profiles for a mid-ventricular myocardial slice. In addition, absolute MBF (ml/g/min) was estimated using Fermi-constrained deconvolution. On semi-quantitative analysis, the ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial MPI was 0.98 +/- A 0.1 at stress and 1.16 +/- A 0.09 at rest, P < 0.0001. The MPRI (i.e. the ratio of stress over rest MPI) for the subendocardium was 1.54 +/- A 0.3 versus 1.81 +/- A 0.35 for the subepicardium, P = 0.03. For quantitative analysis, the ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial MBF was 0.91 +/- A 0.11 at stress versus 1.17 +/- A 0.16 at rest, P < 0.0001. The subendocardial MBF reserve was also lower than in the subepicardium (2.6 +/- A 0.75 vs. 3.32 +/- A 0.93, P = 0.027). In conclusion, semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI shows higher subendocardial blood flow at rest and reduced subendocardial perfusion reserve compared to the subepicardium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据