4.6 Article

Right atrial volume and phasic function in pulmonary hypertension

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 168, 期 1, 页码 420-426

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.133

关键词

Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; Magnetic resonance imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Few studies have focused on right atrial (RA) structure and function in pulmonary hypertension (PH). We sought to evaluate RA volume and phasic function using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and to examine their clinical relevance in PH. Methods: We prospectively studied 50 PH patients and 21 control subjects. RA volume and indices of phasic function (reservoir volume, ejection fraction [EF], and conduit volume) were evaluated by CMR. Results: Maximum RA volume index was significantly higher in PH patients (56 [44-70] ml/m(2)) than in controls (40 [30-48] ml/m(2)) (p<0.001). Reservoir volume index was significantly lower in PH than in controls (p<0.001), but conduit volume index was higher in PH than in controls (p=0.008). RA EF was similar when comparing the two groups (p=0.925). Interestingly, RA EF was increased in PH patients with WHO functional class III patients as compared with controls (p<0.001) but was reduced in advanced PH patients with WHO functional class IV (p<0.01). Maximum RA volume and RA EF significantly correlated with pulmonary hemodynamic indices, atrial and brain natriuretic hormone levels, and CMR-derived right ventricular indices. By contrast, RA reservoir volume correlated with cardiac index and 6-minute walk distance. Conclusions: PH is associated with increased size, decreased reservoir function, and increased conduit function of the right atrium. RA systolic function indicated by RA EF increases in patients with mild to moderate PH but decreases in patients with advanced PH. Varying associations between RA indices and conventional PH indices suggest their unique role in the management of PH. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据