4.6 Article

MSCT guided sizing of the Edwards Sapien XT TAVI device: Impact of different degrees of oversizing on clinical outcome

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 168, 期 3, 页码 2658-2664

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.030

关键词

TAVI; Aortic stenosis; MSCT; Transcatheter valve therapy

资金

  1. Medtronic
  2. Edwards Lifesciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Prospective data on the usage of 3-dimensional imaging based annulus sizing on the outcome of TAVI is not available yet and there is general uncertainty about the optimal degree of oversizing. In the current study we therefore assessed a 3-D MSCT guided over-sizing approach and evaluated the clinical outcome of different degrees of oversizing. Methods: TAVI-size-selection was done using systolic MSCT-annulus cross-sectional-area (CSA) measurements in 107 patients with severe aortic stenosis with the goal to oversize the 3rd generation balloon expandable Edwards Sapien XT (ESTV) device in relation to the native aortic annulus CSA. Results: Among different degrees of oversizing there were no differences in the occurrence of stroke, myocardial infarction and death. No aortic injuries were observed. The overall rate of > mild postprocedural aortic regurgitation (PAR) was 7.6%. Increasing oversizing ratios are associated with lower rates of > mild PAR (r = -0.236, p < 0.02) with the lowest rate of > mild PAR in patients with area based oversizing ratios >25% and the highest rate in patients with oversizing ratios <15% (0% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.02). The rate of postprocedural permanent pacemakers tended to be lower in patients with <15% oversizing compared to those with >25% oversizing (5.3 vs. 16.7%, p < 0.23). Conclusions: MSCT guided ESTV-device sizing is safe and is associated with significantly lower than previously reported rates for PAR. A device/annulus oversizing ratio of 15-25% based on area and 7-12% based on mean diameter appears to provide the best risk-benefit ratio in terms of PAR reduction and conduction disorders. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据