4.6 Article

Pivotal role of inflammation in vascular endothelial dysfunction of hyperlipidemic rabbit and effects by atorvastatin

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 146, 期 2, 页码 140-144

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.06.019

关键词

High-fat diet; Inflammatory markers; Endothelial function; Atorvastatin

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [A2001019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To evaluate the role of inflammation in vascular endothelial function of hyperlipidemic rabbits and atorvastatin's effects on it. Methods: 22 rabbits were divided into high-fat diet and atorvastatin plus high-fat diet group. Basic levels of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), nitric oxide (NO), endothelin-1 (ET-1), fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin and endothelial function were measured when grouping. Eight weeks later, all above parameters were remeasured and repeated again at days 1, 4 and 7 after atorvastatin withdrawal. Results: Eight-week high-fat diet could not cause the changes of FBG and insulin, but significantly induce increased blood lipids as well as inflammatory markers, imbalance between ET-1 and NO, and direct endothelial dysfunction, which could be significantly improved by atorvastatin therapy but could not be well controlled to near baseline. Abrupt withdrawal of atorvastatin caused sharp increase of inflammatory markers and endothelial dysfunction at days 4 and 7 after atorvastatin withdrawal independent of the changes of blood lipids. Conclusions: High-fat diet could cause endothelial dysfunction associated with inflammation, and atorvastatin could counter-regulate it. Sudden withdrawal of statins could induce rebound of inflammatory response and endothelial dysfunction independent of changes of lipids, which may be responsible for increased cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease after withdrawing statins. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据