4.6 Article

Association between endogenous secretory RAGE, inflammatory markers and arterial stiffness

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 132, 期 1, 页码 96-101

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.10.047

关键词

Type 2 diabetes; esRAGE; Inflammation; Arterial stiffness; Cardiovascular disease

资金

  1. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [A 050463]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and its receptor (RAGE) were known to play a pivotal role in the development of cardiovascular complications of diabetes. We investigated the association between circulating endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE) levels, inflammatory markers and arterial stiffness measured using brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV). Methods: The study subjects were composed of 76 type 2 diabetic patients and 78 age- and sex-matched non-diabetic subjects. Results: Circulating esRAGE levels were significantly lower in subjects with type 2 diabetes (0.237 +/- 0.123 ng/ml vs. 0.307 +/- 0.177 ng/ml, p=0.005), and those levels were inversely correlated with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressure, triglyceride, fasting glucose level and insulin resistance. Furthermore, esRAGE levels were significantly associated with adiponectin (r=0.164, p=0.044), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (r=-0.242, p=0.009) levels and baPWV (r=-0.296, p<0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that fasting insulin, IL-6, glucose level and insulin resistance are major factor determining esRAGE (R-2=0.186). Moreover, baPWV was found to be associated with age, systolic blood pressure, triglyceride, sex, BMI, fasting insulin and esRAGE level (R-2=0.583). Conclusions: Circulating esRAGE levels were significantly lower in type 2 diabetic patients, and were associated with inflammation and arterial stiffness. These results suggest that esRAGE may play an important role on ligand-RAGE interaction propagated inflammation and atherosclerosis. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据