4.6 Article

No effects of human ghrelin on cardiac function despite profound effects on body composition in a rat model of heart failure

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 137, 期 3, 页码 267-275

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.094

关键词

Cachexia; Ghrelin; Body composition; Food intake; Heart failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ghrelin, was observed to have treatment-potential for severe chronic heart failure (CHF) and cardiac cachexia based on anti-cachectic and cardio-protective effects. Methods: We performed two studies to assess the effects of human ghrelin on food intake, body weight and body composition, as well as heart function in a rat model of CHF. Study-1 (50 or 500 nmole/kg/d ghrelin by pump infusion) was focused on food intake and body composition, study-2 (50 or 100 nmole/kg/d ghrelin by subcutaneous injection (3-times daily) was focused on heart function due to a lack of cardiac effects observed in study-1. In both studies, myocardial infarction was induced by LAD ligation. On day 28 after surgery, rats were randomized and treated with ghrelin or placebo for 4 weeks. Food intake (study-1), body composition (NMR) cardiac function (echocardiography and invasive hemodynamics (study-2 only) were assessed. Results: In study-1, CHF rats treated with high dose ghrelin showed an increase in body weight (+25%, p<0.001), lean mass (+16%, p<0.01) and fat mass (+17%, p=0.001) vs placebo. In study-2, CHF rats treated with both low-and high dose ghrelin showed an increase in body weight (both + 18%, p=0.001), lean mass (both + 25%, p<0.001) and fat mass (50 nmole/kg/d: + 43%, p<0.05; 100 nmole/kg/d: +45%, p<0.01) vs placebo. However, no beneficial effect of ghrelin treatment on left ventricular ejection fraction or change of LV diameters was observed in either study. Conclusion: Ghrelin treatment results in dose-dependent beneficial effects on body weight and body composition, but does not improve cardiac function. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据