4.7 Article

Consumption of omega-3 fatty acids and the risk of skin cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 135, 期 1, 页码 149-156

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28630

关键词

omega 3; melanoma; diet; squamous cell carcinoma; polyunsaturated fatty acids; meta-analysis; skin cancer; systematic review; basal cell carcinoma

类别

资金

  1. Oxford University Teaching Hospitals
  2. British Association of Dermatologists
  3. Medical Research Council [G0802468] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0802468] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skin cancers have a higher incidence than all other cancers combined and are a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Laboratory data suggest certain dietary constituents, notably omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs), could potentially protect against skin malignancy, although no large-scale review has been conducted in humans. The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to determine the relationship between dietary n-3 PUFAs and skin cancer incidence. It considered all published randomized controlled trials and observational studies up to March 2013. Five studies (two case-control and three cohort) were identified pertaining to oral n-3 PUFA consumption and incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), melanoma (or a combination) and were included in a random-effects meta-analysis. A further six studies considering nondietary n-3 PUFA exposure (e.g. by tissue analysis) and/or recognized biological markers of skin cancer risk (e.g. p53 expression) were analyzed qualitatively. Dietary n-3 PUFAs were not associated with BCC (pooled OR 1.05, 95% CIs 0.86-1.28). Consumption of high levels of n-3 PUFAs were inversely associated with melanoma, although with only one estimate available (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.78), and SCC, although nonsignificantly (pooled OR 0.86, 95% CIs 0.59-1.23). Available evidence is suggestive, but currently inadequate, to support the hypothesis that n-3 PUFAs protect against skin malignancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据