4.7 Article

Adoptive cytotoxic T lymphocyte therapy triggers a counter-regulatory immunosuppressive mechanism via recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 134, 期 8, 页码 1810-1822

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28506

关键词

CTL; MDSC; immunotherapy; adoptive transfer

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24390326, 25460491, 24659625] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complex interactions among multiple cell types contribute to the immunosuppressive milieu of the tumor microenvironment. Using a murine model of adoptive T-cell immunotherapy (ACT) for B16 melanoma, we investigated the impact of tumor infiltrating cells on this complex regulatory network in the tumor. Transgenic pmel-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) were injected intravenously into tumor-bearing mice and could be detected in the tumor as early as on day 1, peaking on day 3. They produced IFN-, exerted anti-tumor activity and inhibited tumor growth. However, CTL infiltration into the tumor was accompanied by the accumulation of large numbers of cells, the majority of which were CD11b(+)Gr1(+) myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Notably, CD11b(+)Gr1(int)Ly6G(-)Ly6C(+) monocytic MDSCs outnumbered the CTLs by day 5. They produced nitric oxide, arginase I and reactive oxygen species, and inhibited the proliferation of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells. The anti-tumor activity of the adoptively-transferred CTLs and the accumulation of MDSCs both depended on IFN- production on recognition of tumor antigens by the former. In CCR2(-/-) mice, monocytic MDSCs did not accumulate in the tumor, and inhibition of tumor growth by ACT was improved. Thus, ACT triggered counter-regulatory immunosuppressive mechanism via recruitment of MDSCs. Our results suggest that strategies to regulate the treatment-induced recruitment of these MDSCs would improve the efficacy of immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据