4.7 Article

Body mass index and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma: A clinical-based cohort and meta-analysis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 132, 期 3, 页码 625-634

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27639

关键词

renal cell carcinoma; body mass index; survival; meta-analysis

类别

资金

  1. SRC Research Center for Women's Diseases of Sookmyung Women's University
  2. Karolinska Institute
  3. Hans-Olov Adami Distinguished Professor Award [2368/10-221]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing evidence suggests that obesity, an established cause of renal cell cancer (RCC), may also be associated with a better prognosis. To evaluate the association between RCC survival and obesity, we analyzed a large cohort of patients with RCC and undertook a meta-analysis of the published evidence. We collected clinical and pathologic data from 1,543 patients who underwent nephrectomy for RCC between 1994 and 2008 with complete follow-up through 2008. Patients were grouped according to BMI (kg/m2): underweight <18.5, normal weight 18.5 to <23, overweight 23 to <25 and obese =25. We estimated survival using the KaplanMeier method and Cox proportional hazard models to examine the impact of BMI on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) with adjustment for covariates. We performed a meta-analysis of BMI and OS, CSS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) from all relevant studies using a random-effects model. The 5-year CSS increased from 76.1% in the lowest to 92.7% in the highest BMI category. A multivariate analysis showed higher OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.290.68) and CSS (HR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.290.77] in obese patients than in normal weight patients. The meta-analysis further corroborated that high BMI significantly improved OS (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.430.76), CSS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.480.74) and RFS (HR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.300.81). Our study shows that preoperative BMI is an independent prognostic indicator for survival among patients with RCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据