4.7 Article

C-terminal deletions of Merkel cell polyomavirus large T-antigen, a highly specific surrogate marker for virally induced malignancy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 131, 期 12, 页码 2863-2868

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27607

关键词

deletion; Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV); Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC); real-time qPCR; integration; physical state; large T-antigen; truncation; viral load

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 67100% of cutaneous Merkel cell carcinomas (MCC) the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) integrates into the host genome. Mutations and deletions truncating the C-terminal helicase domain of the T-antigen (TAg) protein have been detected in these MCCs, but not in healthy skin specimens. C-terminal deletions of the TAg nucleic acid sequences are characteristic for about 38% of these cases. While the association of MCPyV with MCC has been proven, it is unknown whether MCPyV may play a similar role in other tumor entities. We describe in detail the development and validation of a novel Merkel cell polyomavirus TAg C-terminus deletion assay (MCPyV Delta C-TAg). The triplex real-time PCR quantifies the N- and C-terminal part of the MCPyV TAg gene and the cellular beta-globin gene. By comparing the copy numbers of the N- and C-terminal part, deletions of the MCPyV TAg C-terminus are rapidly identified. MCPyV Delta C-TAg was used to assess the physical state of MCPyV TAg in a large series of 55 MCCs, 15 cutaneous lymphomas and 47 forehead smears of healthy individuals. Neither DNA positivity nor viral load was able to discriminate MCCs from the other different types of samples. However, deleted TAg C-terminus sequences were detected only in MCPyV positive MCCs (39%). Consequently, detection of deleted C-terminal TAg sequences appears to be a highly specific surrogate marker for virally induced malignancy and should be used to support novel assumed MCPyVtumor associations. The study further supports the notion that MCPyV does not play a role in cutaneous lymphoma pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据