4.7 Article

Increased hyaluronan content and stromal cell CD44 associate with HER2 positivity and poor prognosis in human breast cancer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 132, 期 3, 页码 531-539

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27707

关键词

breast cancer; hyaluronan; CD44; HER2; obesity

类别

资金

  1. Kuopio University Hospital
  2. Cancer Center of University of Eastern Finland
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  4. Academy of Finland
  5. Finnish Cancer Organisation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous in vitro studies have suggested interactions between hyaluronan (HA), CD44 and HER2. We have studied the expression of HA and CD44 in a material of 278 breast cancer cases, half of which were HER2-positive. Intense stromal HA staining was associated with HER2 positivity, large tumor size, lymph node positivity, hormone receptor negativity, poor differentiation, a high body mass index, increased relapse rate and shortened overall survival. Among the 139 HER2-positive cases, the relapse rate was associated with the intensity of stromal HA staining as most of the relapses occurred in the cases with intense stromal HA staining. The presence of HA in the carcinoma cells was related to the frequency of relapses as none of the patients without HA in carcinoma cells experienced a relapse, whereas 33.3% of those with a high percentage of HA-positive carcinoma cells suffered a relapse. CD44 positivity in carcinoma cells was related to poor differentiation, postmenopausal status and triple negative breast carcinoma. CD44 positivity in stromal cells was associated with HER2 positivity, large tumor size, hormone receptor negativity, poor differentiation, increased relapse rate and shortened overall survival. The association between HER2 positivity and intense stromal HA staining indicates that HA could be one of the factors involved in the unfavorable outcome of HER2-positive patients. This study also suggests that HA in breast carcinoma cells and CD44 in stromal cells may have clinical significance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据