4.7 Article

High prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in unselected Nigerian breast cancer patients

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 131, 期 5, 页码 1114-1123

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27326

关键词

breast cancer; Nigerian; understudied population; BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations; global health; health disparities

类别

资金

  1. NCI [CA-R01 89085-01A, SPORE P50 CA125183]
  2. Entertainment Industry Foundation
  3. Ralph and Marion Falk Medical Research Trust
  4. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  5. US Army DOD [BC990302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inherited mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the strongest genetic predictors of breast cancer and are the primary causes of familial breast/ovarian cancer syndrome. The frequency, spectrum and penetrance of mutant BRCA1/BRCA2 alleles have been determined for several populations, but little information is available for populations of African ancestry, who suffer a disproportionate burden of early onset breast cancer. We have performed complete sequence analysis of all BRCA1 and BRCA2 exons and intronexon boundaries for 434 Nigerian breast cancer patients from the University College Hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria. In contrast to previous suggestions that BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation frequencies are low or undetectable in African American populations, we find that Nigerian breast cancer patients have an exceptionally high frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations (7.1 and 3.9%, respectively). Sixteen different BRCA1 mutations were detected, seven of which have never been reported previously, while thirteen different BRCA2 mutations were seen, six of which were previously unreported. Thus, our data support enrichment for genetic risk factors in this relatively young cohort. To improve breast cancer outcomes, we suggest that family-based models of risk assessment and genetic counseling coupled with interventions to reduce breast cancer risk should be broadly disseminated in Nigeria and other underserved and understudied populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据