4.7 Article

Clinicopathological and functional significance of XRCC1 expression in ovarian cancer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 132, 期 12, 页码 2778-2786

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27980

关键词

DNA repair; XRCC1; ovarian cancer; platinum therapy; predictive; prognostic biomarker

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-ray repair cross-complementing gene 1 (XRCC1) is essential for DNA base excision repair, single strand break repair and nucleotide excision repair. We investigated clinicopathological and functional significance of XRCC1 expression in ovarian cancers. XRCC1 protein expression was evaluated in 195 consecutive human ovarian cancers and correlated with clinicopathological variables and survival outcomes. Functional preclinical studies were conducted in a panel of XRCC1 deficient and proficient Chinese hamster and Human cancer cells for cisplatin chemosensitivity. Clonogenic assay, neutral COMET assay, H2AX immunocytochemistry and flow cytometric analyses were performed in cells. In ovarian cancer, 48% of the tumors were positive for XRCC1 expression and significantly associated with higher stage (p = 0.006), serous type tumors (p = 0.008), suboptimal de-bulking (p = 0.004) and platinum resistance (p < 0.0001). Positive XRCC1 had twofold increase of risk of death (p = 0.007) and progression (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate Cox model, XRCC1 expression was independently associated with cancer specific [p = 0.038] and progression free survival [p = 0.003]. Preclinically, XRCC1 negative cells were sensitive to cisplatin compared to XRCC1 positive cells. Sensitivity to cisplatin in XRCC1 negative cells was associated with accumulation of DNA double strand breaks and G2/M cell cycle arrest. XRCC1 expression is associated with adverse clinicopathological and survival outcomes in patients. Preclinical data provides mechanistic functional evidence for cisplatin sensitivity in XRCC1 negative cells. XRCC1 is a promising predictive biomarker in ovarian cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据