4.7 Article

Predictions of survival up to 10 years after diagnosis for European women with breast cancer in 2000-2002

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 132, 期 10, 页码 2404-2412

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27895

关键词

breast cancer; long-term survival; EUROCARE; stage

类别

资金

  1. Compagnia di San Paolo, Torino, Italy
  2. Public Health Agency for Northern Ireland
  3. Cancer Research UK [16148] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few studies have addressed longer-term survival for breast cancer in European women. We have made predictions of 10-year survival for European women diagnosed with breast cancer in 20002002. Data for 114,312 adult women (1599 years) diagnosed with a first primary malignant cancer of the breast during 20002002 were collected in the EUROCARE-4 study from 24 population-based cancer registries in 14 European countries. We estimated relative survival at 1, 5, and 10 years after diagnosis for women who were alive at some point during 20002002, using the period approach. We also estimated 10-year survival conditional on survival to 1 and 5 years after diagnosis. Ten-year survival exceeded 70% in most regions, but was only 54% in Eastern Europe, with the highest value in Northern Europe (about 75%). Ten-year survival conditional on survival for 1 year was 26% higher than 10-year survival in all European regions, and geographic differences were smaller. Ten-year survival for women who survived at least 5 years was 88% overall, with the lowest figure in Eastern Europe (79%) and the highest in the UK (91%). Women aged 5069 years had higher overall survival than older and younger women (79%). Six cancer registries had adequate information on stage at diagnosis; in these jurisdictions, 10-year survival was 89% for local, 62% for regional and 10% for metastatic disease. Data on stage are not collected routinely or consistently, yet these data are essential for meaningful comparison of population-based survival, which provides vital information for improving breast cancer control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据