4.7 Article

Mortality audit of the Finnish cervical cancer screening program

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 132, 期 9, 页码 2134-2140

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27844

关键词

mass screening; uterine cervical neoplasms; case-control studies; mortality; audit

类别

资金

  1. Finnish Cancer Organizations
  2. European Union Seventh Framework Programme contract EUROCOURSE-Europe against Cancer
  3. European Union Public Health Programme [2006322]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Incidence-based evaluations of cervical cancer screening programs have suggested age-specific impacts and there is uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of screening outside the ages of 3060 years. We audited the screening histories of cervical cancer deaths and conducted a case-control evaluation of the effectiveness of organized screening in different ages with mortality as outcome. We included all 506 cervical cancer deaths in Finland in 20002009 due to cancers diagnosed in 1990 or later, and 3,036 controls matched by age at diagnosis to the cases. Squamous cell carcinoma constituted 59% of the cases, adenocarcinomas 29%, and the remaining 12% were other specified and unspecified cervical malignancies. Most deaths (54%) were due to cancers diagnosed more than 5 years after last screening invitation, 24% were diagnosed among nonattenders and only 14% of deaths occurred among women who had attended invitational screening. The risk reduction associated with attending a single program screen at an age below 40 was nonsignificant (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.331.48), while clear risk reductions were observed after screening at the age of 4054 (OR 0.33; CI 0.200.56) and 5569 (OR 0.29; CI 0.160.54). This study also provides some indication of a long-lasting additional effect of screening at the age of 65. Possible avenues for improving the effectiveness of the Finnish screening program include efforts to increase attendance and an extension of the target ages to include 65-to 69-year-old women. The potential benefit of increasing the sensitivity of the screening test or shortening the screening interval is smaller.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据