4.7 Article

Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms in patients with cutaneous melanoma

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 130, 期 2, 页码 405-418

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26023

关键词

VDR; SNP; melanoma; polymorphism; vitamin D

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [CA112524]
  2. Anbinder Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene has been associated with cancer risk, but only a few polymorphisms have been studied in relation to melanoma risk and the results have been inconsistent. We examined 38 VDR gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a large international multicenter population-based case-control study of melanoma. Buccal DNAs were obtained from 1,207 people with incident multiple primary melanoma and 2,469 with incident single primary melanoma. SNPs with known or suspected impact on VDR activity, haplotype tagging SNPs with =10% minor allele frequency in Caucasians, and SNPs reported as significant in other association studies were examined. Logistic regression was used to calculate the relative risks conferred by the individual SNP. Eight of 38 SNPs in the promoter, coding, and 3' gene regions were individually significantly associated with multiple primary melanoma after adjusting for covariates. The estimated increase in risk for individuals who were homozygous for the minor allele ranged from 25 to 33% for six polymorphisms: rs10875712 (odds ratios [OR] 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.011.62), rs4760674 (OR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.061.67), rs7139166 (OR 1.26; 95%CI, 1.021.56), rs4516035 (OR 1.25; 95%CI, 1.011.55), rs11168287 (OR 1.27; 95%CI, 1.031.57) and rs1544410 (OR 1.30; 95%CI, 1.041.63); for two polymorphisms, homozygous carriers had a decreased risk: rs7305032 (OR 0.81; 95%CI 0.651.02) and rs7965281 (OR, 0.78; 95%CI, 0.620.99). We recognize the potential false positive findings because of multiple comparisons; however, the eight significant SNPs in our study outnumbered the two significant tests expected to occur by chance. The VDR may play a role in melanomagenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据