4.7 Article

Preclinical in vivo evaluation of rapamycin in human malignant peripheral nerve sheath explant xenograft

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 126, 期 2, 页码 563-571

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24783

关键词

Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor; Neurofibromatosis; Mammalian Target of Rapamycin; Neurofibromin

类别

资金

  1. OSOTF
  2. Children's Tumor Foundation
  3. Children's Tumor Foundation Drug Discovery Initiative
  4. Department of Defense

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients are prone to the development of malignant tumors, the most common being Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (MPNST). NF1-MPNST patients have an overall poor survival due to systemic metastasis. Currently, the management of MPNSTs includes surgery and radiation; however, conventional chemotherapy is not very effective, underscoring the need for effective biologically-targeted therapies. Recently, the NF1 gene product, neurofibromin, was shown to negatively regulate the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/Protein Kinase-B (Akt)/mammalian Target Of Rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, with loss of neurofibromin expression in established human MPNST cell lines associated with high levels of mTOR activity. We developed and characterized a human NF1-MPNST explant grown subcutaneously in NOD-SCID mice, to evaluate the effect of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin. We demonstrate that rapamycin significantly inhibited human NF1-MPNST mTOR pathway activation and explant growth in vivo at doses as low as 1.0 mg/kg/day, without systemic toxicities. While rapamycin was effective at reducing NF1-MPNST proliferation and angiogenesis, with decreased CyclinD1 and VEGF respectively, there was no increase in tumor apoptosis. Rapamycin effectively decreased activation of S6 downstream of mTOR, but there was accompanied increased Akt activation. This study demonstrates the therapeutic potential and limitations of rapamycin in NF1-associated, and likely sporadic, MPNSTs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据