4.7 Article

Promoter DNA hypermethylation in gastric biopsies from subjects at high and low risk for gastric cancer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 127, 期 11, 页码 2588-2597

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25274

关键词

Helicobacter; Colombia; Pyrosequencing; promoter; premalignant; intestinal metaplasia; epigenetics

类别

资金

  1. NCRR/NIH (CTSA) [1 UL1 RR024975]
  2. National Cancer Institute [P01 CA028842, R01 CA095103, R01 CA077955, R01 CA093999, P01 CA116087, P30DK058404, R01 DK053620, DK058587]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene promoter CpG island hypermethylation is associated with Helicobacter pylon (H. pylori) infection and may be an important initiator of gastric carcinogenesis. To examine factors influencing methylation, we utilized bisulfite Pyrosequencing (R) technology for quantitative analysis of promoter DNA methylation in RPRM, APC, MGMT and TWIST1 genes using DNA from 86 gastric biopsies from Colombian residents of areas with high and low incidence of gastric cancer. H. pylori colonies were cultured from the same subjects, and gastric pathology was evaluated. Virulence factors cagA (including segments of the 3' end, encoding EPIYA polymorphisms) and vacA s and m regions were characterized in the H. pylori strains. Using univariate analysis, we found significantly elevated levels of RPRM and TWIST1 promoter DNA methylation in biopsies from residents of the high-risk region compared to those from residents of the low-risk region. The presence of cagA and vacA s1m1 alleles were independently associated with elevated levels of promoter DNA methylation of RPRM and MGMT. Using multivariate analysis, DNA methylation of RPRM was associated with location of residence, cagA and vacA s1m1 status and methylation of TWIST1. We conclude that cagA and vacA virulence determinants are significantly associated with quantitative differences in promoter DNA methylation in these populations, but that other as yet undefined factors that differ between the populations may also contribute to variation in methylation status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据