4.7 Article

Cilengitide inhibits progression of experimental breast cancer bone metastases as imaged noninvasively using VCT, MRI and DCE-MRI in a longitudinal in vivo study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 128, 期 10, 页码 2453-2462

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25563

关键词

bone metastases; integrins; osteolysis; volumetric computed tomography; dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB-TR23]
  2. Merck-Serono

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of inhibiting alpha(v)beta(3)/alpha(v)beta(5) integrins by cilengitide in experimentally induced breast cancer bone metastases using noninvasive imaging techniques. For this purpose, nude rats bearing established breast cancer bone metastases were treated with cilengitide, a small molecule inhibitor of alpha(v)beta(3) and alpha(v)beta(5) integrins (75 mg/kg, five days per week; n = 12 rats) and compared to vehicle-treated control rats (n = 12). In a longitudinal study, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and flat panel volumetric computed tomography were used to assess the volume of the soft tissue tumor and osteolysis, respectively, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) MRI was performed to determine functional parameters of the tumor vasculature reflecting blood volume and blood vessel permeability. In rats treated with cilengitide, VCT and MRI showed that osteolytic lesions and the respective bone metastatic soft tissue tumors progressed more slowly than in vehicle-treated controls. DCE-MRI indicated a decrease in blood volume and an increase in vessel permeability and immunohistology revealed increased numbers of immature vessels in cilengitide-treated rats compared to vehicle controls. In conclusion, treatment of experimental breast cancer bone metastases with cilengitide resulted in pronounced antiresorptive and antitumor effects, suggesting that alpha(v)beta(3)/alpha(v)beta(5) inhibition may be a promising therapeutic approach for bone metastases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据