4.7 Article

Anti-breast cancer potential of SS1020, a novel antiestrogen lacking estrogenic and genotoxic actions

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 127, 期 7, 页码 1718-1726

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25167

关键词

antiestrogen; breast cancer; antitumor; uterotrophic activity; genotoxicity

类别

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [ES09418, ES012408]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term treatment with tamoxifen (TAM) increases the risk of developing endometrial cancer in women. Several antiestrogens developed in last decades have been discontinued from clinical testing because of their undesirable effects on the uterus. To avoid such serious side-effect while increasing the drug's anti-breast cancer potential, new triphenylethylene antiestrogens, 2E-3-{4-[(E)-4-chloro-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenylbut-1-enyl]-phenyl} acrylic acid (SS1020) and 2E-3-{4-[(Z)-4-chloro-1,2-diphenylbut-1-enyl]phenyl}acrylic acid (551010), were designed as safer alternatives. Unlike TAM, 551020 does not present significant uterotrophic potential in rats; in contrast, 551010, a compound removing a 4-OH moiety from 551020, represented weak uterotrophic activity. The structurally related compounds 4-hydroxytamoxifen, toremifene, ospemifene, raloxifene (RAL) and GW5638 all have uterotrophic activity. In addition, 551020 and 551010 exhibit no genotoxic activity to damage hepatic DNA in rats. Therefore, 551020 was selected as a safer antiestrogen candidate and used for evaluating the antitumor potential in animals. At the human equivalent doses of TAM, SS1020 had antitumor potential much higher than that of TAM, RAL and GW5638 against 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary carcinoma in rats. The growth of human MCF-7 breast cancer xenograft implanted into athymic nude mice was also effectively suppressed by SS1020. SS1020, lacking estrogenic and genotoxic actions and having strong antitumor potency superior to that of TAM and RAL, could be a safer alternative for breast cancer therapy and prevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据