4.7 Article

Serum olfactomedin 4 (GWI 12, hGC4) in combination with Reg IV is a highly sensitive biomarker for gastric cancer patients

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 125, 期 10, 页码 2383-2392

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24624

关键词

olfactomedin 4; OLFM4; Reg IV; serum tumor marker; gastric cancer

类别

资金

  1. Princes Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund [07-23911]
  2. Ministry of Education. Culture, Science, Sports. and Technology of Japans
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gastric cancer (GC) is 1 of the most common human cancers. Early defection remains the most promising approach to improving long-term survival of patients with GC. We previously performed Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) oil 4 primary GCs and identified several GC-specific genes including Reg IV. Of these genes, olfactomedin 4 (OLFM4, also knonwn as GW112 or hGC-1) is a candidate gene for cancer-specific expression. In this study, we examined the expression of olfactomedin 4 in human GC by immunohistochemistry. We also assessed serum olfactomedin 4 levels in GC patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. 94 (56%) of 167 GC cases were positive for olfactomedin 4 by immunostaining. Olfactomedin 4 staining was observed more frequently in stage I/II cases than in stage III/IV cases. The serum olfactomedin 4 concentration in presurgical GC patients (n = 123, mean +/- SE, 36.3 +/- 3.5 ng/mL) was significantly higher than that in healthy individuals (n = 76, 16.6 +/- 1.6 ng/mL). In patients with stage 1 GC, the sensitivity of serum olfactomedin 4 (25%) and Reg IV (35%) was superior to that of CA19-9 (5%) or CEA (3%). Furthermore, in patients with stage I GC. the combination of olfactomedin 4 and Reg IV elevated the diagnostic Sensitivity to These results suggest that serum olfactomedin 4 is it useful marker for GC and its measurement alone or in combination with Reg IV has utility in the early defection of GC. (C) 2009 UICC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据