4.7 Article

Gene transfer of NK4, an angiogenesis inhibitor, induces CT26 tumor regression via tumor-specific T lymphocyte activation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 125, 期 12, 页码 2879-2886

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24735

关键词

hepatocyte growth factor; c-Met; NK4; antiangiogenesis; cytotoxic T lymphocyte

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) has been shown to be involved in malignant behaviors, such as invasion and metastasis, in different tumors. Hence, HGF could be a target molecule for control of the malignant potential of cancer. NK4 is a competitive antagonist for HGF and exerts an antitumor activity, not only by HGF antagonism but also by anti angiogenesis. Here, we studied the participation of cellular immunity in CT26 tumor regression by NK4 gene transfer. In vivo experiments showed that NK4-induced inhibition of subcutaneous tumor growth (as demonstrated in immunocompetent BALB/c mice) was weakened in T lymphocyte-deficient nude mice. In addition, the immunocompetent BALB/c mice that had shown complete regression of CT26-NK4 tumors generated an immune memory against repeated challenge with the same tumor antigen. Immunohistochemistry of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes showed that the ratio of CD8/CD4 in CT26-NK4 tumors was significantly higher than that in control tumors. Also, the presence of tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) was demonstrated by cytotoxicity assays. Depletion of CD8+ T lymphocytes markedly abrogated the antitumor activity of NK4. However, NK4 had no direct effect on the in vitro cellular immune system. Taken together, these data indicate that NK4 expression by gene transfer, at the tumor site, triggers tumor-specific CTL activation, resulting in complete CT26 tumor regression in vivo. This action was considered to be due to apoptosis induced by NK4's potent antiangiogenic and HGF antagonistic effects. (C) 2009 UICC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据