4.7 Article

CCL17 and CCL22 chemokines within tumor microenvironment are related to accumulation of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in gastric cancer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 122, 期 10, 页码 2286-2293

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23392

关键词

CCL17; CCL22; Foxp3; regulatory T cells; gastric cancer

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been reported that an increased population of regulatory T cells (Tregs) is one of the reasons for impaired anti-tumor immunity. Recently, Foxp3 has been reported as a reliable marker of Tregs. The authors investigated the frequency of Foxp3(+) Tregs within CD4(+) cells in TILs, regional lymph nodes and PBLs of gastric cancer patients (n = 45). Furthermore, to elucidate the mechanisms behind Treg accumulation within tumors, they evaluated the relationship between CCL17 or CCL22 expression and the frequency of Foxp3(+) Tregs in gastric cancer. CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs as a percentage of CD4(+) cells were counted by How cytometry and evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Moreover, an in vitro migration assay using Tregs derived from gastric cancers was performed in the presence of CCL17 or CCL22. As a result, the frequency of Foxp3(+) Tregs in TILs was significantly higher than that in normal gastric mucosa (12.4% +/- 7.5% vs. 4.1% +/- 5.3%, p < 0.01). Importantly, the increase in Tregs in TILs occurred to the same extent in early and advanced disease. Furthermore, the frequency of CCL17(+) or CCL22(+) cells among CD14(+) cells within tumors was significantly higher than that of normal gastric mucosa, and there was a significant correlation between the frequency of CCL17(+) or CCL22(+) cells and Foxp3(+) Tregs in TILs. In addition, the in vitro migration assay indicated that Tregs were significantly induced to migrate by CCL17 or CCL22. In conclusion, CCL17 and CCL22 within the tumor are related to the increased population of Foxp3+ Tregs, with such an observation occurring in early gastric cancer. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据