4.7 Review

Lung cancer epigenetics and genetics

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 123, 期 1, 页码 1-7

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23605

关键词

lung cancer; epigenetics; epidemiology; non-small cell lung cancer

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death and thus a major health problem. The efficiency of current treatment modalities for lung cancer depends strongly on the time of diagnosis, with better chances of survival if a tumor has been detected at an early stage. Thus, there is an urgent need for rapid and efficient early detection methods. Biomarkers represent a possible alternative to current, rather expensive, screening tools such as spiral computer tomography (CT), or may allow the identification of high risk groups for whom screening would be cost efficient. Although most lung cancers are the consequence of smoking, a substantial fraction of molecular-epidemiological studies point to high-prevalence, low-penctrance genetic polymorphisms as modifiers of environmental lung cancer risk. In the past the genomics field has also made significant advances in identifying genetic lesions that can now be harvested with the goal of identifying novel biomarkers for lung cancer. Furthermore, the importance of epigenetic changes that occur during lung cancer development has been reported, but has been underestimated in the past. Novel high-throughput, quantitative assays for the detection of DNA methylation or histone tail modifications are now applied, to search for alterations in the lung cancer genome and will identify novel cancer-related genes that may become attractive targets for treatment, provide new insight into the biology of lung cancers, and could also become useful biomarkers for the early detection of lung cancer in sputum, or may be used as prognostic markers. Thus, an integrative approach in lung cancer research combining epidemiological, genetic and epigenetic information becomes an important concept for the future. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据