4.5 Article

The impact of excess heat events in Maricopa County, Arizona: 2000-2005

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY
卷 52, 期 8, 页码 765-772

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00484-008-0169-0

关键词

Heat wave; Mortality; Heat index; Temperature; Air pollution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to excess heat is preventable yet it is the primary weather-related cause of mortality in the United States. In the Southwest United States, high temperatures are common and indoor environments often have cooling devices. In summer 2005, Maricopa County, Arizona experienced a 182% increase in reported heat-related deaths in comparison to 2000-2004. We examined at-risk populations and excess mortality. We characterized heat-related deaths using descriptive and multivariate time-series analyses of county vital record data from June-September 2000-2005. Dose-response relationships for heat-related mortality and heat index were evaluated using linear and quadratic splines. From June-September, 2000-2005, 136 heat-related deaths (0.68 per 100,000) were reported; 49 (36%) occurred in 2005. In July 2005, a 14-day heat wave resulted in 28 (57%) reported deaths-a 102% increase in comparison to the same time period in 2000-2004. Decedent demographics in 2005 did not differ from previous years. The mean age of all 136 deaths was 56 years (range: 7-92 years). Of those with discernable reported injury locations, 62 (66%) were identified outdoors. Forty-eight (77%) decedents identified outdoors were < 65 years; conversely, 26 (82%) decedents who were found indoors were >= 65 years. A 6% (95% CI: 1.00-1.13) increase in mortality risk was observed for each degree (F) increase in heat index. Excess heat impacted a younger population in Maricopa County and many deaths occurred outdoors. Consecutive days of heat exposure-even among a heat-acclimated population-can increase mortality risk. Public health response activities guided by locally obtained data will better target those at risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据