4.7 Article

Candidate chemosensory Genes in Female Antennae of the Noctuid Moth Spodoptera littoralis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 1036-1050

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.4469

关键词

Olfactory receptor; Gustatory receptor; Odorant-binding protein; Expressed sequence tag; Lepidoptera; Spodoptera littoralis

资金

  1. INRA [ANR-09-BLAN-0239-01]
  2. Genoscope partnership
  3. Swedish Government Linnaeus initiative Insect Chemical Ecology, Ethology and Evolution
  4. Swedish Science Council
  5. Trygger Foundation
  6. Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical senses are crucial for all organisms to detect various environmental information. Different protein families, expressed in chemosensory organs, are involved in the detection of this information, such as odorant-binding proteins, olfactory and gustatory receptors, and ionotropic receptors. We recently reported an Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) approach on male antennae of the noctuid moth, Spodoptera littoralis, with which we could identify a large array of chemosensory genes in a species for which no genomic data are available. Here we describe a complementary EST project on female antennae in the same species. 18,342 ESTs were sequenced and their assembly with our previous male ESTs led to a total of 13,685 unigenes, greatly improving our description of the S. littoralis antennal transcriptome. Gene ontology comparison between male and female data suggested a similar complexity of antennae of both sexes. Focusing on chemosensation, we identified 26 odorant-binding proteins, 36 olfactory and 5 gustatory receptors, expressed in the antennae of S. littoralis. One of the newly identified gustatory receptors appeared as female-enriched. Together with its atypical tissue-distribution, this suggests a role in oviposition. The compilation of male and female antennal ESTs represents a valuable resource for exploring the mechanisms of olfaction in S. littoralis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据