4.2 Article

Murine double minute clone 2 309T/G and 285G/C promoter single nucleotide polymorphism as a risk factor for breast cancer: a Polish experience

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 E105-E110

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.5301/JBM.2012.9140

关键词

MDM2; Breast cancer; Polymorphism

资金

  1. Poznan University of Medical Sciences [502-01-01124182-07474]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Breast cancer is a multifactorial disease caused by complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors. Recently, a functional polymorphism, MDM2 285G>C (rs117039649), has been discovered. This polymorphism antagonizes the effect of the 309T>G (rs2279744) polymorphism on the same gene, resulting in decreased MDM2 transcription. Methods: The MDM2 285G>C and 309T>G polymorphisms were identified by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and sequencing analysis in women with breast cancer (n=468) and controls (n=550). Results: The odds ratio (OR) for breast cancer patients with the MDM2 285C/C and 285G/C genotypes was 0.4768 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2906-0.7824; p=0.0033, p(corr)=0.0066). We also found a significantly lower frequency of the MDM2 285C allele in patients with breast cancer than in controls: the OR for the C allele in patients with breast cancer was 0.4930 (95% CI=0.3059-0.7947, p=0.0031, p(corr)=0.0062). The p value of the chi-square test for the trend observed for the MDM2 285G>C polymorphism was statistically significant (p(trend)=0.0036). The statistical power of this study amounted to 85% for the G/C or C/C genotypes and 85% for the C allele. However, we did not observe significant differences between the distribution of MDM2 309T>G genotypes and alleles in patients with breast cancer and healthy controls. Conclusion: In a sample of the Polish population, we observed that the MDM2 285C gene variant may be a significant protective factor against breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据