4.7 Article

Adaptively differential expression analysis in gill of Chinese mitten crabs (Eriocheir japonica sinensis) associated with salinity changes

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.054

关键词

Eriocheir japonica sinensis; Osmoregulation; Gill; qPCR; Salinity change

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301050]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20171276, 12KJA180009]
  3. Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory [JKLBS2016001]
  4. Qing Lan Project
  5. 333 Project
  6. Outstanding Young Talents of YCTU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Desalination of marine species has become an important development direction for aquaculture in China and other countries. However, that how to regulate the salt balance to adapt to new freshwater habitats is a serious challenge for marine species in desalination of aquaculture. In the study, Chinese mitten crabs (Eriocheir japonica sinensis) was selected to analyse the adaptively differential expression in salinity changes for their novel characteristics of life history. The results showed that gill was the most relevant tissue in osmoregulation that was validated by biomarkers (Na+ /K+-ATP, V-type H+-ATPase) with qPCR. Na+ /K+-ATPase is a primary transporter and maintains the body fluid osmolality by actively pumping Na+ to the hemolymph, and V-type Fl(+)-ATPase is responsible for acid-base balance and nitrogen excretion. So both transcriptome data and qPCR results showed the significantly differential expression of Na+ /K+-ATPase and V-type H-ATPase in gills. Moreover, NAK-alpha had the most significantly differential expression level in salinity change, and other genes such as GST, HSP90, S27, UBE, VATS also revealed significantly up-regulation. They are considered the key enzymes during the transition from a marine environment to land. Present results have provided a foundation to further understand the molecular adaptive mechanism in desalination of marine species. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据