4.7 Article

Encapsulation of probiotic Bifidobacterium longum BIOMA 5920 with alginate-human-like collagen and evaluation of survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.08.018

关键词

Microspheres; Bifidobacteria; Alginate; Human-like collagen; Survival

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2007AA03Z456]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20776119, 21076169, 31000019]
  3. Xi'an Research and Development Program [NC08005, YF07078]
  4. Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education, China [08JK452, 08JK453, JG08181, 2010JC21, 2010J5107, 2010JS108, 2010JK876, 2010JS109]
  5. Shaanxi Provincial Scientific Technology Research and Development Program [2007K06-03, 2010JQ2012, SJ08B03]
  6. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20096101120023, 20096101110014]
  7. Shaanxi Key Subject Program, China.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alginate (ALg)-human-like collagen (HLC) microspheres were prepared by the technology of electrostatic droplet generation in order to develop a biocompatible vehicle for probiotic bacteria. Microparticles were spherical with mean particle size of 400 mu m. The encapsulation efficiency (EE) of ALg-HLC microspheres could reach 92-99.2%. Water-soluble and fibrous human-like collagen is combined with sodium alginate through intermolecular hydrogen bonding and electrostatic force which were investigated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FOR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSc), thus the matrix of ALg-HLC was very stable. Bifidobacterium longum BIOMA 5920, as a kind of probiotic bacteria, was encapsulated with alginate-human-like collagen to survive and function in simulated gastrointestinal juice. Microparticles were very easy to degradation in simulated intestinal juices. After incubation in simulated gastric (pH 2.0, 2 h), the encapsulated B. longum BIOMA 5920 numbers were 4.81 +/- 0.38 log cfu/g. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据