4.7 Article

Development of reduced-fat mayonnaise using 4αGTase-modified rice starch and xanthan gum

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.02.008

关键词

Mayonnaise; Reduced fat; Viscoelastic properties; 4 alpha GTase

资金

  1. Korean Government (MOEHRD) [KRF-2006-005-J04703]
  2. Cooperative Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development, RDA, Republic of Korea [200803A01033092]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2006-005-J04703] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study a disproportionating enzyme, 4-alpha-glucanotransferase (4 alpha GTase), was used to modify the structural properties of rice starch to produce a suitable fat substitute in reduced-fat (RF) mayonnaise. The mayonnaise fat was partially substituted with the 4 alpha GTase-treated starch paste at levels up to 50% in combination with xanthan gum and the physical and rheological properties of the modified RF mayonnaise samples were investigated. All mayonnaises prepared in this study exhibited shear thinning behavior and yield stress. Viscoelastic properties of mayonnaise were characterized using dynamic oscillatory shear test and it was observed that mayonnaises exhibited weak gel-like properties. The magnitude of elastic and loss moduli was also affected by 4 alpha GTase-treated starch concentration and presence of xanthan gum. In relation to microstructure, RF mayonnaise prepared with 3.8 or 5.6 wt% of 4 alpha GTase-treated starch and xanthan gum showed smaller droplets. The use of 5.6 wt% of 4 alpha GTase-treated starch and 0.1 wt% of xanthan gum produced a RF mayonnaise with similar theological properties and appearances as FF mayonnaise with gum. This study demonstrated a high feasibility for using 4 alpha GTase-treated rice starch as a viable fat replacer in mayonnaise. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据