4.6 Article

MITOCHONDRIA: Investigation of in vivo muscle mitochondrial function by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.02.014

关键词

Mitochondrial function; Skeletal muscle; P-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Saturation transfer; Phosphocreatine recovery

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [700.58.421]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK [BB/I001174/1]
  3. MRC and Arthritis Research UK [MR/K006312/1]
  4. Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
  5. BBSRC [BB/I001174/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I001174/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most important function of mitochondria is the production of energy in the form of ATP. The socio-economic impact of human diseases that affect skeletal muscle mitochondrial function is growing, and improving their clinical management critically depends on the development of non-invasive assays to assess mitochondrial function and monitor the effects of interventions. P-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy provides two approaches that have been used to assess in vivo ATP synthesis in skeletal muscle: measuring P-i -> ATP exchange flux using saturation transfer in resting muscle, and measuring phosphocreatine recovery kinetics after exercise. However, P-i -> ATP exchange does not represent net mitochondrial ATP synthesis flux and has no simple relationship with mitochondrial function. Post-exercise phosphocreatine recovery kinetics, on the other hand, yield reliable measures of muscle mitochondrial capacity in vivo, whose ability to define the site of functional defects is enhanced by combination with other non-invasive techniques. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据