4.6 Review

Keeping things quiet: Roles of NuRD and Sin3 co-repressor complexes during mammalian development

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.07.022

关键词

Development; Histone deacetylase; Epigenetics; Chromatin; Stem cells

资金

  1. EMBO Long Term Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. Wellcome Trust 4-Year PhD Fellowship
  3. MRC [G0800784, G0300723] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0700711B, G0300723B, G0300723, G0800784, G0800784B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene inactivation studies of mammalian histone and DNA-modifying proteins have demonstrated, a role for Many such proteins in embryonic development. Post-implantation embryonic lethality implies a role for epigenetic factors in differentiation and in development of specific lineages or tissues. However a handful of chromatin-modifying enzymes have been found to be required in pre- or peri-implantation embryos. This is significant as implantation is the time when inner cell mass cells of the blastocyst exit pluripotency and begin to commit to form the various lineages that will eventually form tire adult animal. These observations indicate a critical role for chromatin-modifying proteins in the earliest lineage decisions of mammalian development. and/or in the formation of the first embryonic cell types. Recent work has shown that the two major class I histone deacetylase-containing co-repressor complexes, the NuRD and Sin3 complexes, are both required at peri-implantation stages of mouse development, demonstrating the importance of histone deacetylation in cell fate decisions. Over the past 10 years both genetic and biochemical Studies have revealed surprisingly divergent roles for these two co-repressors in mammalian cells. In this review we will summarise the evidence that the two major class I histone deacetylase complexes in mammalian cells, the NuRD and Sin3 complexes, play important roles in distinct aspects of embryonic development. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据