4.6 Article

Low and high affinity receptors mediate cellular uptake of heparanase

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.09.003

关键词

heparanase; glycosylation; lectin array; mannose 6-phosphate; binding; receptor

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA106456] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA106456-05, R01 CA106456, R01-CA106456] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heparanase is an endoglycosidase which cleaves heparan sulfate and hence participates in degradation and remodeling of the extracellular matrix. Importantly, heparanase activity correlated with the metastatic potential of tumor-derived cells, attributed to enhanced cell dissemination as a consequence of heparan sulfate cleavage and remodeling of the extracellular matrix barrier. Heparanase has been characterized as a glycoprotein, yet glycan biochemical analysis was not performed to date. Here, we applied the Qproteome (TM) GlycoArray kit to perform glycan analysis of heparanase, and compared the kit results with the more commonly used biochemical analyses. We employed fibroblasts isolated from patients with I-cell disease (mucolipidosis II), fibroblasts deficient of low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein and fibroblasts lacking mannose 6-phosphate receptor, to explore the role of mannose 6-phosphate in heparanase uptake. Iodinated heparanase has been utilized to calculate binding affinity. We provide evidence for hierarchy of binding to cellular receptors as a function of heparanase concentration. We report the existence of a high affinity, low abundant (i.e., low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, mannose 6-phosphate receptor), as well as a low affinity, high abundant (i.e., heparan sulfate proteoglycan) receptors that mediate heparanase binding, and suggest that these receptors co-operate to establish high affinity binding sites for heparanase, thus maintaining extracellular retention of the enzyme tightly regulated. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据