4.2 Article

Design, fabrication, and characterization of a composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 697-707

出版社

WICHTIG EDITORE
DOI: 10.1177/039139880803100803

关键词

Bone scaffold; Design parameters; Mechanical characterization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) scaffolds have been successfully used in bone tissue engineering, with or without hydroxyapatite (HA) and with a macroporosity given either by simple PLGA sphere packaging and/or by leaching out NaCl. The objective of this work was the optimization of the design parameters for bone tissue engineering scaffolds made by sintering microspheres of PLGA, HA nanocrystals for matrix reinforcement and osteoconduction, and salt crystals for macroporosity and control of matrix pore size. Microsphere fabrication by a single-emulsion and solvent evaporation technique was first optimized to obtain a high yield of PLGA microspheres with a diameter between 80 and 300 pm. The influence of the sintering process and matrix composition on the scaffold structure was then evaluated morphologically and mechanically. Three scaffold types were tested for biocompatibility by culturing with human fibroblasts for up to 14 days. The most important parameters to obtain microspheres with the selected diameter range were the viscosity ratio of the dispersed phase to the continuous phase and the relative volume fraction of the 2 phases. The Young's modulus and the ultimate strength of the sintered matrices ranged between 168-265 MPa and 6-17 MPa, respectively, within the range for trabecular bone. Biocompatibility was demonstrated by fibroblast adhesion, proliferation, and spreading throughout the matrix. This work builds upon previous work of the PLGA/HA sintering technique to give design criteria for fabricating a bone tissue engineered matrix with optimized morphological, functional, and biological properties to fit the requirements of bone replacements. (Int J Artif Organs 2008; 31: 697-707)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据