4.7 Article

In vitro evaluation of ceftaroline alone and in combination with tobramycin against hospital-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) isolates

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.02.006

关键词

Ceftaroline; Aminoglycoside synergy; HA-MRSA

资金

  1. Forest Laboratories
  2. Astellas
  3. Cubist Forest
  4. Pfizer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftaroline and its potential for synergy with tobramycin in comparison with vancomycin against a collection of hospital-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA), including isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. Ceftaroline, vancomycin, daptomycin and linezolid susceptibilities were determined for 200 HA-MRSA isolates. Four randomly selected strains [ including one vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) and one heteroresistant VISA (hVISA)] were evaluated in time-kill experiments with ceftaroline and vancomycin alone or combined with tobramycin at 0.25 and 0.5 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). MICs for 50% and 90% of the organisms (MIC(50) and MIC(90), respectively) were both 1 mg/L for ceftaroline and were 1 mg/L and 2 mg/L, respectively, for vancomycin. The same ceftaroline MIC ranges (0.25-2 mg/L) were observed for isolates recovered from respiratory tract samples, blood or skin. In time-kill experiments, no synergy was observed at 0.25x MIC against any tested isolates with either ceftaroline or vancomycin. In contrast, the combination of ceftaroline plus tobramycin at 0.5x MIC was synergistic against the two MRSA strains and the hVISA but was indifferent against the VISA isolate. In conclusion, ceftaroline demonstrated antimicrobial activity independently of the specimen source and exhibited lower MICs than vancomycin. Finally, at sub-MIC levels, ceftaroline plus tobramycin displayed significantly greater activity than vancomycin plus tobramycin against MRSA (P < 0.01). (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据