4.7 Article

Activity of cephalosporin CXA-101 (FR264205) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia group strains and isolates

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.03.021

关键词

Pseudomonads; beta-Lactamase; Efflux; Cystic fibrosis; Ceftazidime

资金

  1. Calixa Therapeutics Inc., San Diego, CA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Twenty-five years after its introduction, ceftazidime remains the most active cephalosporin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nevertheless, resistance arises by upregulation of AmpC beta-lactamase, by efflux or, less often, via acquisition of additional beta-lactamases. Mutational resistance is especially prevalent among cystic fibrosis (CF) isolates. We examined the activity of a novel oxyimino-aminothiazolyl cephalosporin, CXA-101 (FR264205), against P. aeruginosa strains with defined resistance mechanisms as well as against multiresistant clinical CF isolates of P. aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CXA-101 were determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute agar dilution method and were 0.25-0.5 mg/L for 'typical' P. aeruginosa strains without acquired resistance, compared with 1-2 mg/L for ceftazidime. MICs of CXA-101 were 0.5-2 mg/L and 4 mg/L, respectively, for isolates with upregulated efflux or total AmpC derepression, compared with 2-16 mg/L and 32-128 mg/L for ceftazidime. Full activity was retained against OprD mutants resistant to imipenem. Substantive resistance (MICs >= 32 mg/L) arose for transconjugants with PER, VEB and OXA extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and for metallo-beta-lactamase producers, with reduced susceptibility (MIC = 8 mg/L) for transconjugants with OXA-2, OXA-3 and NPS-1 enzymes. MICs of CXA-101 were 2- to 16-fold below those of ceftazidime for multiresistant P. aeruginosa from CF patients, but ranged up to > 128 mg/L; values for B. cepacia from CF resembled those for ceftazidime. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据