4.7 Review

Pneumococcal vaccines: mechanism of action, impact on epidemiology and adaption of the species

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.01.021

关键词

Streptococcus pneumoniae; vaccine; conjugated; antibiotics; resistance; epidemiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pneumococcal infections elicited by Streptococcus pneumoniae ( pneumococcus) ( pneumonia, otitis media, sinusitis, meningitis) are frequently occurring diseases that are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality even in developed countries. Pneumococci colonise the nasopharynx of up to 50% of children, and up to 5% of adults are pneumococcal carriers. Two pneumococcal vaccines are currently in clinical use. One of them contains 23 capsular polysaccharides of the as yet known 91 different pneumococcal serotypes. Because polysaccharide vaccines primarily induce a B-cell-dependent immune response, this type of vaccine prevents bacteraemia but does not efficiently protect the host against pneumococcal infection. In 2000, a vaccination programme was launched in the USA making use of a novel pneumococcal conjugate vaccine containing capsular polysaccharides derived from the seven most frequent pneumococcal serotypes causing pneumococcal disease in children <2 years of age. Conjugation of capsular polysaccharides with a highly immunogenic protein, i.e. a non-toxic diphtheria toxoid, induces a B- and T-cell response resulting in mucosal immunity and thus effectively protects against vaccine serotypes that induce invasive pneumococcal disease, thereby at the same time reducing vaccine serotype carrier rates. Pronounced herd immunity resulted in a decrease in invasive pneumococcal diseases in vaccinees and non-vaccinees as well as reduced antibiotic resistance rates. However, recent studies report that serotypes eradicated by the vaccine are being replaced by non-vaccine pneumococcal serotypes. This so-called 'replacement' might soon threaten the success of vaccine use. (C) 2008 Elsevier B. V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据