4.6 Article

Experimental and numerical analysis of a rectangular helical coil actuator for electromagnetic bulging

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6680-z

关键词

Electromagnetic forming; Lorentz force; Rectangular helical coil; Coupled electromagnetic and mechanical analysis

资金

  1. programs on Fusion Core Technology for Industry - Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Korea [10040078]
  2. Fundamental Research Program of the Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Korea government (MSIP) [2012R1A5A1048294]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electromagnetic sheet forming process for aluminum alloy sheets was studied experimentally and numerically with a rectangular helical coil actuator. The widely used planar spiral coils are associated with a low magnetic pressure at their center that imposes limitations on the shapes of sheet products. In order to generate a relatively uniform magnetic pressure, a rectangular helical coil is introduced with parallel wires covering the working area uniformly. Two approaches were used for the analysis. In the analytical modeling approach, the analytical expression for the magnetic pressure was obtained, assuming that the wires are equivalent to a current sheet. In the numerical modeling approach, a loosely coupled scheme was introduced to solve the electromagnetic and mechanical problems. The Maxwell equations were first solved for estimation of the magnetic pressure exerted on the workpiece ignoring any workpiece deformations. The magnetic pressure variation was then used as a boundary condition in the mechanical calculation for estimation of the deformation of the workpiece. For validation of the developed numerical model, a rectangular helical coil actuator was designed and tested to form a half ellipsoid with aluminum alloy sheets. The measured and predicted shapes of the half ellipsoid were compared. The effects of the coil design parameters for increasing the magnetic pressure are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据