4.5 Article

Association Between Heme Oxygenase-1 Promoter Polymorphisms and the Development of Albuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes A Case-Control Study

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 94, 期 43, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001825

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sanofi-Aventis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heme oxygenase (HO)-1 is a key enzyme in cytoprotective mechanisms against oxidative stress in the cardiovascular-renal system. The T(-413)A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and (GT)(n) microsatellite polymorphism in the HO-1 gene promoter modulate the HO-1 gene transcriptional activity and these polymorphisms are associated with various human diseases.We investigated the association between HO-1 promoter polymorphisms and nephropathy in type 2 diabetes. We sequenced the T(-413)A SNP and (GT)(n) repeat segments of the HO-1 gene promoter in 536 patients with type 2 diabetes. (GT)(n) alleles were divided into 2 groups: short (S, 25 GT repeats) and long (L, >25 GT repeats) alleles. The presence of albuminuria was used as a marker of diabetic nephropathy.Patients with the TT genotype in the T(-413)A SNP were significantly more susceptible to albuminuria development than those carrying the A allele, with an odds ratio of 1.577 (95% confidence interval, 1.088-2.285; P=0.016). Subgroup analysis showed that patients carrying the TT genotype with long duration of diabetes (20 years), poor glycemic control, male gender and without hypertension had higher odds ratios for the development of albuminuria. In vitro, promoter activity of the T(-413)A SNP was higher with A allele than T allele. Regarding to the (GT)(n) repeats, the LL genotype showed a higher odds ratio for the development of albuminuria only in patients with hypertension when compared to the S allele.In conclusion, the T(-413)A SNP in the HO-1 promoter is significantly associated with albuminuria development in type 2 diabetes patients, especially with longer duration and poor glycemic control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据