4.6 Article

Wear of non-segmented and segmented diamond wheels in high-speed deep grinding of carbon fibre-reinforced ceramics

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6082-2

关键词

Surface grinding; High-speed deep grinding; Carbon fibre-reinforced ceramics; Segmented grinding wheel; Wear mechanism

资金

  1. German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon fibre-reinforced ceramics (CFRCs) are relatively new and promising materials for various high-tech. industrial applications due to their superior properties. However, the employment of these materials has been impeded by their high machining costs. A specially designed metal-bonded segmented diamond wheel has been developed in order to reduce the cutting forces and temperatures and enhance the MRR. Studying the wear behaviour and wear mechanisms of the segmented wheel, compared to a non-segmented wheel with the same specification, was necessary for economic assessment of the process. The investigation was conducted for a surface grinding process. The selected cutting conditions assure an acceptable range of the surface roughness and a high material removal rate. The radial wear, the G-ratio and the wear behaviour of the wheels were examined at the specified specific material removals up to 4,704 mm(3)/mm. Compared to the non-segmented wheel, the segmented wheel has experienced higher radial wear. However, the G-ratio can be increased considerably by the intermittent grinding process. The main wear mechanisms of the segmented wheel are the inter-crystalline grain fracture and grain pull-out, while in the case of non-segmented wheel, the grain flattening is the main wear mechanism. Furthermore, grinding forces and temperatures, which influence the wear behaviour of a wheel considerably, are significantly reduced by the intermittent grinding process. The residual stress analysis showed that the utilized grinding processes have induced just a negligible residual stress into the CFRC workpieces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据