4.6 Article

Effect of adding SiC powder on surface quality of quartz glass microslit machined by WECDM

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6602-0

关键词

WECDM; Quartz; SiC; Surface roughness; Microslit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quartz, being hard and brittle, is difficult to machine. Although good machining effects of quartz have been achieved by wire electrochemical discharge machining (WECDM), the surface quality of microslits obtained needs to be enhanced and higher machining precision is desired. To attain improvement in quartz machining, this study performs WECDM under titrated electrolyte flow with the addition of silicon carbide (SiC) powder. On the one hand, titrated electrolyte can facilitate rapid replenishment of the electrolyte, which contributes to maintain the stability of the insulating gas film, thus ensuring frequent and steady electrical discharge for better machining precision. On the other hand, the SiC powder added can help polish the finished workpiece for surface quality enhancement. Experiments are conducted to determine the appropriate machining parameters and to explore the processing mechanisms involved. Comparison in terms of machining precision and surface quality is made for WECDM conducted with and without additives. Experimental results show that better surface roughness and precision of microslits can be obtained with brass wire electrodes of 150 mu m diameter and SiC powder of 11 mu m at 5 wt%. The addition of abrasive SiC powder helped decrease surface roughness from 1.13 to 0.22 mu m, an improvement in surface quality by 80 %. Moreover, the mean slit width was also reduced from 200 to 185 mu m. Hence, WECDM of quartz glass under titrated electrolyte with SiC powder added to the electrolyte can indeed enhance surface quality and precision of the microslit. Moreover, not only does such approach use less electrolyte, but also it incurs lower cost and less pollution, making it cost effective and environmental friendly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据