4.6 Article

Densification of alumina components via indirect selective laser sintering combined with isostatic pressing

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4668-0

关键词

Indirect selective laser sintering; Isostatic pressing; Alumina ceramic; Density

资金

  1. Hubei Province natural science fund [2011CDB280]
  2. National Key Technology R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology [2012BAF08B03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve the final density of ceramic parts via indirect selective laser sintering (SLS), cold/hot isostatic pressing (CIP/HIP) technologies were introduced into the process. The proposed approach in the present study combined spray drying with mechanical mixing by which we prepared a kind of compound powder consisting of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, 1.5 wt%), epoxy resin E06 (8 wt%), and alumina so as to get a good fluidity for SLS. At the first step, SLS parts reached the highest relative density of about 32 % when the laser energy density was 0.094 J/mm(2), which facilitated the next operation and improvement of final density. Then, a soft polymer canning was prepared for CIP around the surface of SLS alumina ceramic parts using pre-vulcanized natural rubber latex RTV-2, gelation and film. Following that, we experimented on different CIP maximum pressure which had different effects on densification of SLS alumina parts, the whole process in CIP was divided into three stages of I, II, and III. Based on thermal gravity curve of epoxy resin E06, ignoring the impacts of the only 1.5 wt% PVA on degreasing, green bodies were degreased and furnace-sintered. Finally, the relative density of alumina parts reached 95.94 % after HIP process. Field emission scanning electron microscopy was used to analyze the densification evolvement in each stage of process and the fracture mechanism. The study showed a positive and practical approach to manufacture ceramic matrix and ceramic components with complex shape by indirect SLS technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据