4.2 Article

Use of exploratory factor analysis to ascertain the correlation between the activities of rheumatoid arthritis and infection by human parvovirus B19

期刊

MEDICINA-LITHUANIA
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 18-24

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.1016/j.medici.2015.01.004

关键词

Human parvovirus B19; Rheumatoid arthritis; Exploratory factor analysis

资金

  1. Latvian Council of Sciences and National Program in Biomedicine [09.1112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objective: We evaluated a possible correlation between the clinical activities of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and human parvovirus B19 (B19) infection using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Materials and methods: RA patients were organized into two groups: 100 patients in the main groupand97intheRA(DAS28) group. Foursub groups were defined from the main group according to the presence or absence of certain infection-specific markers: group I comprised 43 patients whohadIgGantibodiesagainstB19; groupII, 25patientswithactiveB19infection(B19-specificIgM antibodies and/or plasma viremia); group III, 19 patients with latent/persistent B19 infection (virus-specific sequences in peripheral blood leukocytes' DNA with or without B19-specific IgG antibodies), and group IV, 13 patients without infection markers. The RA(DAS28) group was divided into four subgroups similarly to the main group: group I, 35; group II, 31; group III, 19; and group IV, 12 patients. Disease-specific clinical values in both groups were analyzed employing EFA, and the RA(DAS28) group was additionally assessed using Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28. Results: RA activitywashigherinpatientswhohad markersofB19infection. Thehighestactivity of RA in both study groups was in patients with latent/persistent infection. In the RA(DAS28) group, according to DAS28, the highest activity of RA was in patients with active B19 infection. Conclusions: Using EFA and DAS28, a correlation between the clinical activity of RA and B19 infectionwasconfirmed. ThesedatasuggestthatEFAisapplicableformedico-biologicalstudies. (C) 2015 Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据