4.5 Article

Effect of sexual segregation on host-parasite interaction: Model simulation for abomasal parasite dynamics in alpine ibex (Capra ibex)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY
卷 40, 期 11, 页码 1285-1293

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.03.015

关键词

Sexual segregation; Parasite transmission dynamics; Mathematical model; Gastiointestinal nematodes; Behaviour; Capra ibex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated whether sexual segregation might affect parasite transmission and host dynamics, hypothesising that if males are the more heavily Infected sex and more responsible for the transmission of parasite infections, female avoidance of males and the space they occupy could reduce infection rates. A mathematical model, simulating the interaction between abomasal parasites and a hypothetical alpine ibex (Capra ibex) host population composed of its two sexes, was developed to predict the effect of different degrees of sexual segregation on parasite intensity and on host abundance. The results showed that when females tended to be segregated from males, and males were distributed randomly across space, the impact of parasites was the lowest, resulting in the highest host abundance, with each sex having the lowest parasite intensity. The predicted condition that minimises the impact of parasites in our model was the one closest to that observed in nature where females actively seek out the more segregated sites while males are less selective in their ranging behaviour. The overlapping of field observation with the predicted optimal strategy lends support to our idea that there might be a connection between parasite transmission and sexual segregation Our simulations provide the biological boundaries of hostparasite interaction needed to determine a parasite-mediated effect on sexual segregation and a formalised null hypothesis against which to test future field experiments (C) 2010 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据